rchk complaints #39
Description
While checking against rhub/rchk, it spots the following issues:
Function cpp11::detail::store::insert(SEXPREC*)
[PB] has negative depth /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/protect.hpp:302
[UP] attempt to unprotect more items (2) than protected (0), results will be incomplete /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/protect.hpp:302
[PB] has possible protection stack imbalance /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/protect.hpp:305
Function cpp11::writable::r_vector<double>::reserve_data(SEXPREC*, bool, long)
[PB] has negative depth /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1342
[UP] attempt to unprotect more items (2) than protected (0), results will be incomplete /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1342
[PB] has possible protection stack imbalance /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1343
Function cpp11::writable::r_vector<double>::resize_data(SEXPREC*, bool, long)
[PB] has negative depth /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1367
[UP] attempt to unprotect more items (1) than protected (0), results will be incomplete /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1367
[PB] has possible protection stack imbalance /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1368
Function cpp11::writable::r_vector<double>::resize_names(SEXPREC*, long)
[PB] has negative depth /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1389
[UP] attempt to unprotect more items (1) than protected (0), results will be incomplete /github/home/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.6/cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:1389Full details here: https://github.com/tdaverse/phutil/actions/runs/14893316603/job/41830462913.
I filed r-lib/cpp11#456 with a possible fix.
In the meantime, I applied the fix by temporarily vendoring {cpp11} headers.
Now rchk does not complain anymore. {phutil} actually passes checks against all rhub platforms.
This is done in the branch called no-vignettes because rhub currently does not play nicely with quarto vignettes.
If you agree with this temporary vendoring {cpp11} idea, I can replicate that in the main branch which should put the package in good shape for a submission to CRAN.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels