We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For example, instead of send(params: SendParameters), i.e. requiring users to write this:
send(params: SendParameters)
send(SendParameters{ bounce: true, to: sender(), value: 0, });
we could support inlining of the fields of SendParameters as pseudo-parameters of the send() function, allowing the following usage:
SendParameters
send()
send(bounce: true, to: sender(), value: 0); // ^^^^ default
This might or might not be generalized to apply everywhere Structs or Messages are used as parameters. This is up for discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
For example, instead of
send(params: SendParameters)
, i.e. requiring users to write this:we could support inlining of the fields of
SendParameters
as pseudo-parameters of thesend()
function, allowing the following usage:This might or might not be generalized to apply everywhere Structs or Messages are used as parameters. This is up for discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: