You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, Thanks for the Great job on maintaining this project. It's awesome !
I'm using mochapack in my project and my issue is when I generate a test results report for Sonar - using mocha-sonarqube-reporter - this report is ignored by Sonar because it only reference the generated webpack bundle name and not the effectives tests files.
It's possible to add a describe block (with file name) to each test file, but I think is bad.
Do you have any idea to generate a report with the correct test files references ? Do you think that it's possible to implement a new feature fixing this ?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Had the same issue when using the mochawesome reporter as well. I wrote a new UI to make this work correctly. It should work with other reporters as well. It uses the BDD interface and fixes filename/line number information. Use at your own risk.
Hello,
First of all, Thanks for the Great job on maintaining this project. It's awesome !
I'm using mochapack in my project and my issue is when I generate a test results report for Sonar - using mocha-sonarqube-reporter - this report is ignored by Sonar because it only reference the generated webpack bundle name and not the effectives tests files.
It's possible to add a describe block (with file name) to each test file, but I think is bad.
Do you have any idea to generate a report with the correct test files references ? Do you think that it's possible to implement a new feature fixing this ?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: