Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to official Mercurial docs instead of our lesson #941

Open
maneesha opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Link to official Mercurial docs instead of our lesson #941

maneesha opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@maneesha
Copy link
Contributor

maneesha commented Aug 9, 2023

How could the content be improved?

The git lesson intro refers to Mercurial as an alternative for version management and links to a very old SWC lesson (has not been updated in 6+ years). Consider linking to the actual Mercurial site instead (which is also old but...).

Which part of the content does your suggestion apply to?

https://swcarpentry.github.io/git-novice/01-basics.html#the-long-history-of-version-control-systems

@maneesha
Copy link
Contributor Author

maneesha commented Aug 9, 2023

Also in that paragraph, Mercurial is called a more modern system - not sure if that applies.

@martinosorb
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks maneesha. I'm leaning towards not fixing this: while few people will want to use Mercurial, I don't see why we should forget that old lesson entirely. It's there in the remote case someone may benefit from it. Regarding the "more modern system", it does not state that it's more modern than git, but that it's 'distributed' like git, and unlike older systems like Subversion.

@maneesha
Copy link
Contributor Author

maneesha commented Oct 8, 2024

If the maintainers don't want to forget an old lesson entirely, we could consider linking both the 7+ year old lesson and the official Mercurial site (which as noted above is also out of date -- it uses Python 2.7??). Please close this issue if you think the change should not be made.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants