Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Enhance query input functionality #279

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dishit7
Copy link
Contributor

@dishit7 dishit7 commented Sep 4, 2024

Update Dependencies and Refactor QueryInput Component

Overview

This pull request primarily focuses on updating dependencies, enhancing the QueryInput component, and improving TypeScript type references. The changes aim to improve functionality, maintainability, and overall code quality.

Changes

  • Key Changes:
    • Added drizzle-orm and marked dependencies to package.json files for enhanced ORM capabilities and markdown parsing.
    • Updated TypeScript type references in extension-env.d.ts to reflect the new naming convention for the extension.
  • New Features:
    • Introduced a contentEditable div in the QueryInput component, allowing for more flexible user input handling.
    • Implemented a handleInput function to update the query state based on the content of the editable div.
  • Refactoring:
    • Removed the textarea element in favor of a div with contentEditable, streamlining the input handling process.
    • Simplified the onKeyDown event handler by separating input handling logic, improving readability and maintainability.
Additional Notes - Consider adding error handling for user input in the `handleInput` function to ensure robustness. - It may be beneficial to document the rationale behind switching from `textarea` to `contentEditable` for future reference. - Ensure that the new dependencies do not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing code.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description

@dishit7
Copy link
Contributor Author

dishit7 commented Sep 4, 2024

Sorry I just noticed that the number of changed lines in the project increased significantly due to the recent package updates. If this is a concern, please let me know if you would prefer to keep these changes or if any adjustments should be made. I’m happy to address any feedback or make further modifications as needed.

Copy link
Contributor

kaizen-bot bot commented Sep 4, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

All Clear: This commit looks good! 👍

📊 Stats

  • Total Feedbacks: 3
  • Suggested Refinements: 0
  • Files Affected: 2

🏆 Code Quality

[█████████████████░░░] 85% (Good)


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Reply with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Explain: Reply with !explain [issue number] for more details on a specific issue
  • Ignore: Reply with !ignore [issue number] to mark an issue as false positive
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

@dishit7
Copy link
Contributor Author

dishit7 commented Sep 21, 2024

Hey, just checking in on my PR. Is the team planning to move forward with it? No worries if not, just wanted to know! Thanks for your time, would appreciate any feedback .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants