You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When calling a select query after using the update option with an external key, the limit does not work correctly. An error "A 'limit' was applied without an explicit 'order'" is returned. After adding an additional order, the limit is not applied at all. The problem does not occur when using select alone.
Example of implementation:
supabase
.from('home')
.update(home)
.eq('id', home.id)
.select('id, image(url)')
.limit(1, { foreignTable: 'image' }) // FIX-ME: This is not working;
It is a combination of one to many one house can have many images. As a result, we want to get only one instead of a list of all.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Create two arrays in which one has a key to the other with an external key using a one-to-many relationship.
Creation of any elements
Calling update query from library and then select with external key and limit constraint
Expected behavior
The result should be the same as for select called separately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately, I don't know how to share queries from your library because I use it on the BED side. If necessary I will transfer to FED and try to get but the case is very simple. To answer your question I don't want to limit how many elements will get the update just the result of select which is executed after the update. I checked and if I execute it as a separate element then it works correctly ie.
Bug report
Describe the bug
When calling a select query after using the update option with an external key, the limit does not work correctly. An error "A 'limit' was applied without an explicit 'order'" is returned. After adding an additional order, the limit is not applied at all. The problem does not occur when using select alone.
Example of implementation:
It is a combination of one to many one house can have many images. As a result, we want to get only one instead of a list of all.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
The result should be the same as for select called separately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: