Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (89 loc) · 7.83 KB

pipeline_process.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (89 loc) · 7.83 KB
Raw

Pipeline process

Pipeline for QA is a project board for developers and testers used to track the status of a pull request, get reviews and manual testing, and run autotests.

The generally accepted requirements for its use are described below:

Opening a PR

  • Once a PR is created, it moves to the REVIEW column where a review will be requested automatically.
  • You can also request a review inside the PR from a particular person if needed.
  • When creating a PR, do not forget to assign it to yourself.
  • Also in case the PR adds new functionality, a description MUST be added.

What if the work is still in progress?

  • If PR work is not finished yet, please mark it as a draft or add [WIP] to the title and keep it in the CONTRIBUTOR column until it's ready to be reviewed/tested.
  • Alternatively, you can open a draft.

When is a PR considered ready to move forward?

Ready for testing, a PR should meet the following criteria:

  1. Reviewed and has at least 1 approval.
  2. Rebased to the develop branch (both status-mobile and status-go if needed, depending on what part has changes).
    • NOTE: QAs can use the Update with rebase button from GitHub if:
      • The PR has no status-go changes.
      • The PR has no conflict with the develop branch.
  3. All possible conflicts have been resolved.
  4. Has the label: request-manual-qa or skip-manual-qa.
  5. PRs MUST identify what area is affected and should have a description.

E2E tests and analyzing the results

The PR MUST be moved to the E2E column when it is ready for testing (mandatory for all PRs). That will also trigger e2e tests run. QAs are monitoring PRs from E2E column and take it into test. This step cannot be skipped. So, at least one comment from the status-im-auto bot with results is a prerequisite for moving forward. Information on how to analyze tests can be found here. Tests might be flaky, as they depend on infrastructure - SauceLabs and Waku.

If there are Failed tests and you are not sure about the reason, you can always ping the mobile QAs for help (preferably in PRs by @status-im/mobile-qa).

For now, it is the only reliable source of regression in the app because, due to time constraints, it is not possible to test thoroughly each PR. Please, respect this rule.

Testing PR

Adding skip-manual-qa

Do not hesitate to use a skip-manual-qa if you're sure that it is a simple flow and you checked it.

  • Please ask another team member before adding the skip-manual-qa label (PR/Status community/DMs) so that there's a second opinion.
  • The PR MUST have a proper reasoning why manual QA is skipped.
  • The PR MUST include the steps of testing that has been done by the developer prior to moving it forward.

NOTE: Make sure that QAs are OK with that;

Before merging PRs, please make sure that information is added about how you tested the PRs, that e2s have been passed and their results have been reviewed.

The QA team appreciates your help!

Manual testing

Prerequisites for manual testing

  1. PR has a description of the change and details the area of the application affected by the change.
  2. PR has automation results from the previous E2E test run step.
  3. PR includes a demo, test steps, and any possible regression(s)
  4. If appropriate, PR details what elements of a feature are out of scope.

If one of the prerequisites is missing, the PR will be moved to the contributor folder with a corresponding comment.

  • If you think a PR needs and is ready for manual testing, please add the request-manual-qa label.
  • QA engineer picks up one of PRs with the request-manual-qa label, drags the item to the IN TESTING column and assigns it to themselves.
  • During testing, QA will add comments describing the issues found, and also review automation tests results. Usually found issues are numbered as "Issue 1, Issue 2", etc. When the first round of testing is completed and all issues for this stage are found, the QA can add the Tested - Issues label and drag the card to the CONTRIBUTOR column. These two actions are optional.

IMPORTANT NOTE: when the issues are fixed, developer MUST notify the QA that it is ready to be re-tested again by mention them in the PR.

  • When manual testing of the PR is fully completed and all the issues are fixed, the QA adds the Tested - OK label and drags the card to the Design review column (the cases when design review is necessary are described below).
  • If design review is not required, the QA drags the PR to the MERGE column. After that the developer merges PR into develop.
  • If design review has been done, the designer (@Francesca-G) drags the PR to the MERGE column. After that the developer merges PR into develop.
  • If manual testing/design review was not carried out, the developer drags PR to the MERGE column themselves.

Design review

How do I know if a design review is needed?

There are three cases here depending on the changes in the PR:

  1. Functional PRs with UI changes: after the Tested - OK label is added, the QA moves the PR to the Design review column + mentions @Francesca-G in comments.
  2. Component PRs: once the PR has received a review from developers and e2e tests results, it can be moved directly to the Design review column by the developer (manual testing step can be skipped) + the developer mentions @Francesca-G in comments.
  3. Functional PRs changes in which are not related to UI (e.g. a crash fix): skip the Design review step (the PR should only be manually tested by QA).

There are three possible scenarios when the design review is completed:

  1. Approved by design > the PR is moved to the MERGE column by Francesca
  2. Some changes requested, but can be fixed as followups > need to be negotiated with Francesca > Francesca moves PR to the MERGE column and adds the Follow-up required label > follow-ups should be added by the dev right after the PR is merged
  3. Some changes requested, they should be fixed before merge > Francesca reviews the PR again after the fixes and moves PR to the MERGE column from Design review

Notes:

  • If your PR has a long story and started from develop branch several days ago, please rebase it to current develop before adding label
  • if PR can be tested by developer (in case of small changes) and/or developer is sure that the changes made cannot introduce a regression, then PR can be merged without manual testing. Also, currently, PRs are not manually tested if the changes relate only the design (creation of components, etc.) and do not affect the functionality (see skip-manual-qa label)

Why my PR is in Contributor column?

PR can be moved to this column by the status-github-bot or by QA engineer with label Tested-issues or if one of the requirements for manual QA was not met. In the first case most often this happens due to conflicting files in PR. In the second case - after fixing of all found issues, the developer should ping the QA in the PR comments for retesting.

Merging a PR

Merge conditions:

  1. Required number of reviews received

  2. E2E results are received and reviewed

  3. All commits are squashed into one.

  4. No conflicting files in PR

  5. No issues from lint

  6. Pay attention to automation checks (some of them are not blockers, best to check before merge anyway)

  7. In case of manual testing - the label Tested - OK from QA

  8. In case of design review - the approval from the designer

You can merge your PR into develop - some useful clues you can find here

HAPPY DEVELOPMENT! 🎉