-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible to use JDK xml utilities instead of simple-xml? #1
Comments
Thanks for your feedback and great to hear that you're using our project! You're right, the current dependency to simple-xml is a bit heavy. After we kicked out Guava (which was obviously even more a concern!), we'll definitely take replacing simple-xml with something lightweight in consideration. The JDK or a thin wrapper around it sounds good, we still need to look into Android compatibility, though. Give us some time, please 😄 |
I have forked your repo and released to central so that I can release this: https://github.com/takari/jdkget Thanks for the XAR code, very helpful! |
Great, thanks for releasing! I've just created #2 to track progress for when we have implemented the "official" deployment to central. Unfortunately, time is short these busy days... |
No problem. No rush on my side. I'm good for now. |
They can't be used on Android anyway and it reduces the (shaded) standalone version in size (#1).
I am using xar in a utilities where I'm making a shaded JAR, and the simple-xml framework is doubling the size. Not a huge concern but seems everything required to parse the simple ToC is in the JDK.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: