-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding analytic geometric stiffness for TACSShellElement #354
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code is looking good! Eigenvalues and buckling modes match for unstiffened panels with old complex-step buckling solution and the new exact G matrix buckling solution.
Testing panel buckling verification cases from my ml_buckling
smdogroup repo
Case 1 - 3 x 1 aluminum unstiffened plate under axial loading,
mode 1- new (TACS eigval = 3.8507, CPT closed-form eigval = 4.000)
mode 1- complex-step (TACS eigval = 3.851)
mode 2 - new (TACS eigval = 4.2018)
mode 2 - complex-step (TACS eigval = 4.202 )
Case 2 - Unstiffened Metal Panel under Shear Load
The closed-form solution is not exact here, so I decided to compare modes and eigenvalues against previous complex-step case.
mode 1 - new (TACS eigval = 4.4387)
mode 1- complex-step (TACS eigval = 4.4387)
Adding geometric stiffness implementation for
TACSShellElement
.Implementation currently works, tested on both tri and quad elements.
Should significantly improve accuracy of buckling derivatives in real and complex mode (no more finite differencing over a finite difference).
Closes #246, Closes #294