We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thanks for handling this one @adityasaky ! I think we can safely close it now with the merge of #1175 I'll track a slight follow up to handle the "but how to do know the rules were always followed?" question. In verifying source, we talk about this, which is more about ensuring that a PR means the final revision was looked at. I think we can add a new item there that says "all the revisions on the protected ref should have provenance". That's pretty much begged question for these "rules continuity" topics. I'll track a follow up and take a crack at it.
Thanks for handling this one @adityasaky ! I think we can safely close it now with the merge of #1175
I'll track a slight follow up to handle the "but how to do know the rules were always followed?" question.
In verifying source, we talk about this, which is more about ensuring that a PR means the final revision was looked at.
I think we can add a new item there that says "all the revisions on the protected ref should have provenance".
That's pretty much begged question for these "rules continuity" topics. I'll track a follow up and take a crack at it.
Originally posted by @zachariahcox in #1136
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
zachariahcox
No branches or pull requests
Originally posted by @zachariahcox in #1136
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: