Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2025. It is now read-only.

InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs12.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions #2600

Open
3 tasks done
pomSense opened this issue Jul 31, 2023 · 14 comments
Open
3 tasks done

InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs12.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions #2600

pomSense opened this issue Jul 31, 2023 · 14 comments

Comments

@pomSense
Copy link

pomSense commented Jul 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Issue Summary

With the recent deprecation of nodejs 12 for create/update of lambda functions, there seems to be some default setting that is causing below error even when the runtime is set as nodejs14.x. Is anyone else facing this?

 error:
  InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs12.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions. We recommend you use the new runtime (nodejs18.x) while creating or updating functions.
    at Object.extractError (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/protocol/json.js:52:27)
    at Request.extractError (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/protocol/rest_json.js:49:8)
    at Request.callListeners (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:106:20)
    at Request.emit (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:78:10)
    at Request.emit (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:686:14)
    at Request.transition (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:22:10)
    at AcceptorStateMachine.runTo (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/state_machine.js:14:12)
    at /Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/state_machine.js:26:10
    at Request.<anonymous> (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:38:9)
    at Request.<anonymous> (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:688:12)
    at Request.callListeners (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:116:18)
    at Request.emit (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:78:10)
    at Request.emit (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:686:14)
    at Request.transition (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:22:10)
    at AcceptorStateMachine.runTo (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/state_machine.js:14:12)
    at /Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/state_machine.js:26:10
    at Request.<anonymous> (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:38:9)
    at Request.<anonymous> (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/request.js:688:12)
    at Request.callListeners (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:116:18)
    at callNextListener (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/sequential_executor.js:96:12)
    at IncomingMessage.onEnd (/Users/pom/.serverless/components/registry/npm/@sls-next/[email protected]/node_modules/@sls-next/aws-lambda/node_modules/aws-sdk/lib/event_listeners.js:335:13)
    at IncomingMessage.emit (events.js:412:35)
    at IncomingMessage.emit (domain.js:475:12)
    at endReadableNT (internal/streams/readable.js:1334:12)
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:82:21) {
  code: 'InvalidParameterValueException',
  time: 2023-07-31T18:28:27.520Z,
  requestId: 'cff19338-f555-412a-a491-f60fce310c87',
  statusCode: 400,
  retryable: false,
  retryDelay: 3.660071109674945
}

Actual behavior

When using using runtime:

 runtime:
      defaultLambda: 'nodejs14.x'
      apiLambda: 'nodejs14.x'
      imageLambda: 'nodejs14.x' 
     
## OR
 runtime: 'nodejs14.x'

it is using nodejs12.x as the runtime parameter somewhere.

Expected behavior

When setting the runtime to nodejs14.x, it should set the runtime parameter as nodejs12.x.

Steps to reproduce

  • nvm use 14.19.0
  • set the runtime to nodejs14.x as shown above
  • run serverless command

Screenshots/Code/Configuration/Logs

Here is my yml:

legacyFrontend:
  component: '@sls-next/[email protected]' # it is recommended you pin the latest stable version of serverless-next.js
  org: myCompany
  app: legacy
  stage: staging
  inputs:
    domain:
      - 'my.legacy'
      - 'myCompany.com'
    domainType: 'both'
    domainRedirects:
      www.legacy.myCompany.com: https://my.legacy.mycompany.com
    memory: 1024
    runtime:
      defaultLambda: 'nodejs14.x'
      apiLambda: 'nodejs14.x'
      imageLambda: 'nodejs14.x' # Note that the sharp image library is built for Lambda Node.js 14.x, although it will likely work fine on other runtimes
    region: us-west-1
    bucketName: my-bucket-name-here

I've also tried doing the runtime as a string:

legacyFrontend:
    runtime: 'nodejs14.x'

Node version on local is: 14.19.0

Running in Debug mode doesn't provide any clues to me:

  DEBUG ─ Deploying bucket my-bucket-name-here in region us-east-1.
  DEBUG ─ Checking if bucket my-bucket-name-here exists.
  DEBUG ─ Setting acceleration to "true" for bucket my-bucket-name-here.
  DEBUG ─ Bucketmy-bucket-name-here was successfully deployed to the us-east-1 region.
  DEBUG ─ Starting deployment of lambda zcgizmn-yzfb33a to the us-east-1 region.
  DEBUG ─ Syncing role zcgizmn-1rb33sq in region us-east-1.
  DEBUG ─ Saved state for role zcgizmn-1rb33sq.
  DEBUG ─ Role zcgizmn-1rb33sq was successfully deployed to region us-east-1.
  DEBUG ─ Deployed role arn is arn:aws:iam::000000000000:role/zcgizmn-1rb33sq.
  DEBUG ─ Packaging lambda code from /Users/pom/Code/legacy/services/frontend/.serverless_nextjs/default-lambda.
  DEBUG ─ Uploading zcgizmn-yzfb33a lambda code.
  
 error:
  InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs12.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions. We recommend you use the new runtime (nodejs18.x) while creating or updating functions.

Versions

  • OS/Environment: macOS 13.0.1 (22A400)
  • @sls-next/serverless-component version: 3.7.0
  • Next.js version: "9.3.5"

Checklist

  • You have reviewed the README and FAQs, which answers several common questions.
  • You have reviewed our DEBUGGING wiki and have tried your best to include complete information and reproduction steps (including your configuration) as is possible. As there is only one maintainer (who maintains this in his free time) and thus very limited resources, if you have time, please try to debug the issue a bit yourself if possible.
  • You have first tried using the most recent latest or alpha @sls-next/serverless-component release version, which may have already fixed your issue or implemented the feature you are trying to use. Note that the old serverless-next.js component and the serverless-next.js plugin are deprecated and no longer maintained.
@balintant
Copy link

Hey, any update on this? We're experiencing the same issue with one of our projects in maintenance stage.
cc: @lukesday

@tanuj-g
Copy link

tanuj-g commented Aug 3, 2023

Hello,
I wanted to check if there are any updates on the issue we discussed earlier. It seems like we are facing a similar problem in one of our projects that is currently in the maintenance stage. Just wanted to keep you in the loop about it.
cc: @lukesday

@lukesday
Copy link

lukesday commented Aug 3, 2023

In our case the code was being deployed before the config update is applied, which means the runtime update is never applied. In order to rectify this I manually updated the runtime on the lambda functions from within the AWS dashboard.

@mbaquerizo
Copy link

I am using AWS codebuild to deploy my application and I'm seeing the exact same issue. I'm specifying 'nodejs16.x' as the runtime but the build uses node 12. I tried what @lukesday did above but no dice. Very strange.

@tanuj-g
Copy link

tanuj-g commented Aug 7, 2023

@mbaquerizo
Same

I'm encountering a similar predicament when leveraging AWS CodeBuild for my application deployment. My specification for the runtime is 'nodejs14.x', however, it seems to revert to node 12 in the build process. I have tried replicating the steps that @lukesday recommended, but it hasn't resolved the issue. This is quite an enigmatic situation that we need to look into.

@mbaquerizo
Copy link

@tanuj-g have you found any alternate solution? This is blocking our production deployments at the moment. The strange part is that the default value set by @sls-next/aws-lambda seems to be node 10 (im not sure if/how this is used by the serverless-component package):
https://github.com/serverless-nextjs/serverless-next.js/blob/master/packages/serverless-components/aws-lambda/src/component.ts#L42

The default used by @sls-next/serverless-component is 'nodejs14' e.g. https://github.com/serverless-nextjs/serverless-next.js/blob/master/packages/serverless-components/nextjs-component/src/component.ts#L598-L601

Where is 12 coming from?

@tanuj-g
Copy link

tanuj-g commented Aug 8, 2023

@mbaquerizo no I haven't the solution yet. This is blocking out production deployments too at this moment

@mbaquerizo
Copy link

mbaquerizo commented Aug 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@mbaquerizo no I haven't the solution yet. This is blocking out production deployments too at this moment

@tanuj-g I found a workaround for my case. After deleting the template files in S3 .serverless folder for my app, the build ran successfully.

Edit: I just realized my build has a sync step to prevent adding new IAM roles. It adds the .serverless folder to s3 after deploying. Every build syncs up with before and after with S3. I guess for some reason having a .serverless file with template containing runtime version 'nodejs12.x' in the local directory prevents serverless components from using the specified runtime from serverless.yml

@ryanolee
Copy link

As a heads up the underlying build mechanism for this library has been deprecated if you are using the components CLI @mbaquerizo @tanuj-g @pomSense.

Given the build machine for this is still hosted by serverless.com but no longer maintained https://github.com/serverless/components/issues/1040 it might be worth looking to re platform if you do have the chance (Possibly to sst or amplify)

@Lee-ji-soo
Copy link

Lee-ji-soo commented Feb 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Any update on this? We're faced on same issue so that our entire project deployments are stopped.

my error message is below.

[email protected]
@sls-next/[email protected]

InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs14.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions

@Lee-ji-soo
Copy link

Any update on this? We're faced on same issue so that our entire project deployments are stopped.

my error message is below.

[email protected] @sls-next/[email protected]

InvalidParameterValueException: The runtime parameter of nodejs14.x is no longer supported for creating or updating AWS Lambda functions

I fixed .yml file
runtime: defaultLambda: "nodejs20.x"

and It worked

@RaiSaugat
Copy link

RaiSaugat commented Feb 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@Lee-ji-soo I tried the same settings but mine didn't work. Could you give me a sample of your pipeline?

@Lee-ji-soo
Copy link

Lee-ji-soo commented Feb 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@RaiSaugat

@Lee-ji-soo I tried the same settings but mine didn't work. Could you give me a sample of your pipeline?

If you resize image with lambda function (ex.https://s3.....?width=200) , you should also set "imageLambda" node version to 20.

defaultLambda: 'nodejs20.x'
apiLambda: 'nodejs20.x'
imageLambda: 'nodejs20.x'

my pipeline sample is below

blurblur:
  component: '@sls-next/[email protected]'
  inputs:
    roleArn: 'arn:awsblurblur'
    bucketName: 'blurblur'
    bucketRegion: 'ap-northeast-2'
    cloudfront:
      distributionId: 'blurblur'
    runtime:
      defaultLambda: 'nodejs20.x'
      apiLambda: 'nodejs20.x'
      imageLambda: 'nodejs20.x'
    build:
      env:
        NEXT_PUBLIC_ENV_NODE: 'production'

@psurma
Copy link

psurma commented Mar 18, 2024

For me, the runtime setting only worked when I defined it as follows:

runtime: nodejs20.x

It seemed to ignore when setting each individual lambda version.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
9 participants
@psurma @balintant @lukesday @ryanolee @RaiSaugat @mbaquerizo @pomSense @Lee-ji-soo @tanuj-g