Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Process: Organize a reviewer workshop #1043

Open
hongsupshin opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Process: Organize a reviewer workshop #1043

hongsupshin opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Process Action items from next steps

Comments

@hongsupshin
Copy link
Contributor

@hongsupshin hongsupshin added the Process Action items from next steps label Feb 14, 2025
@hongsupshin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Todo

  • Add Ana to the ticket
  • Organized a kickoff meeting
  • Schedule the date and format

@hongsupshin
Copy link
Contributor Author

hongsupshin commented Mar 5, 2025

Let's decide the format and date first.

  • Date: I think it would make sense to do a workshop after the reviewers are assigned to their papers. Currently "Assignment of reviewers to papers" is set to early June, so we can organize this right after that. This gives us about 3 months.
  • Format
    • Option 1. Video conference: As the program committee has been doing, we can organize a zoom session (in two different time slots or we record this) and do a presentation. I'd say maybe 20-30 min presentation with 10-15 min Q&A?
    • Option 2. Written instructions: I think what we have in the 2022 page is good but this is mostly about fairness and general guidance, and we will have to provide something more specific. I think regardless of the zoom meeting, we will have to document this and keep it in our repo so that reviewers have access to it all the time.

@anacomesana @ameyxd Thoughts?

@anacomesana
Copy link
Collaborator

anacomesana commented Mar 5, 2025

I think it makes sense to have a video tutorial after the assignments! That way they can take a look at them and bring up any specific questions they may have.
But it would be good to refer them to written instructions and have them read them before the video tutorial. Perhaps something in checklist format, or prompting questions for each section? We could also refer to the previous criteria.

@ameyxd
Copy link
Contributor

ameyxd commented Mar 5, 2025

I agree with @anacomesana. In the past we had comprehensive text instructions, and still had some reviewers not follow them. Additionally, a detailed zoom session, especially with content where I highlight what NOT to do (e.g. lazy reviews, etc.) would be the best. That should be about 30-45 mins.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Process Action items from next steps
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants