You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following up on #991 - in addition to updates to the documentation, it would be beneficial for users to see example usage of imbalanced-learn with scikit-learn-intelex imbalanced-learn to demonstrate usage and performance benefits.
I have prepared a notebook with some experiments, using examples taken from imbalanced-learn docs and the default hardware configuration on Google Colaboratory, comparing performance of scikit-learn and scikit-learn-intelex for several examples with smaller dataset configurations and a handful of examples using larger dataset configurations.
Would a more polished version of this notebook or something similar be of interest to include in imbalanced-learn examples? I see that most examples are .py scripts, but in this case it would be ideal to see a comparison of performance which is why a notebook was prepared, but am curious to hear what your preference would be here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Following up on #991 - in addition to updates to the documentation, it would be beneficial for users to see example usage of imbalanced-learn with scikit-learn-intelex imbalanced-learn to demonstrate usage and performance benefits.
I have prepared a notebook with some experiments, using examples taken from imbalanced-learn docs and the default hardware configuration on Google Colaboratory, comparing performance of scikit-learn and scikit-learn-intelex for several examples with smaller dataset configurations and a handful of examples using larger dataset configurations.
Would a more polished version of this notebook or something similar be of interest to include in imbalanced-learn examples? I see that most examples are .py scripts, but in this case it would be ideal to see a comparison of performance which is why a notebook was prepared, but am curious to hear what your preference would be here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: