Should this crate be moved to rust3ds?

[ian-h-chamberlain]

@AzureMarker @Meziu since we finally have the possibility to rename stuff in the @rust3ds org, does it make sense to move this repo there as well? Obviously it's still in early stages but it depends pretty heavily on ctru-rs and development will happen in tandem with that crate.

Assuming we do move it, I would suggest archiving https://github.com/rust3ds/citro3d-sys and moving this with its current name (or maybe just the name citro3d but -rs might be more googleable since citro3d is already a thing that exists).

Thoughts?

[Meziu]

I believe citro3d-rs is the best option, kept with the same standard as ctru. You can move it already if you want to, there should be no issue.

[AzureMarker]

+1

[ian-h-chamberlain]

Ok, cool. Because the repo is a fork, I have to detach it before I can transfer back to the organization, so I've just opened a ticket with support to do that.

Once it's done, I'll transfer back and then I think the original citro3d-sys repo can be archived.

[ian-h-chamberlain]

Awesome, it's done! @Meziu do you want to archive the -sys crate now?

[Meziu]

citro3d-sys has been archived