You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I got very confused about the exact steps I needed to do to test out some changes to std while drafting an idea to resolve an outstanding issue, just to check feasibility before I made too many claims. The issue comes in that the rustc-dev-guide is what's linked from from rust-lang/Rust, and the opening page mentions here, the std-dev-guide, which contains a lot of helpful procedural and code style/requirements info, and other neat internals info, but nothing about actually building or testing std(/core/alloc etc).
Unfortunately, you're then left confused, and going back to both the README of the main Rust repo, and the rustc-dev-guide to try and scan for any chapter heading mentioning "std" or "library" or similar, until you finally have to sit down and just read and realize it's in the guide called "building the compiler", and running tests is in "testing the compiler".
Honestly if I was newer to coding or otherwise didn't know how bootstrapping compilers and the distribution thereof worked, I probably would've assumed rustc-dev-guide was a lost cause altogether. It's an odd situation where the existence of this guide makes the presence of this info in rustc-dev-guideless obvious, because there's a specific place it "should" be. This is probably especially true for people newer to programming or open source than me who may be concerned that technical talk about building the compiler may go over their heads, but would be comfortable trying to play with std since that's mostly the type of code they're familiar with.
Note, this is mentioned here: #1 but I thought an explicit issue may be better than a comment on that:
* [ ] How to build/test/document the standard library (`x.py build/test/doc --stage 0 library/std` respectively
I can try drafting a simple PR to either copy over and simplify this info as appropriate, or at least say "for building and testing follow the instructions at (link to building the compiler) and (link to testing the compiler)" when I have time, but for now I thought I'd at least raise the issue.
(Edit: I do see now in the rustc book there's a listing in the Getting Started that lists std, core, alloc etc, but it's easy to miss and doesn't change much for this book. x.py also explicitly asks what you want to do but you're unlikely to get there yourself IMO.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clone rust, cd in
Run cargo install --path src/tools/x
To set up for library dev run x setup library
Then run x check library/std and x test library/std
I got very confused about the exact steps I needed to do to test out some changes to
std
while drafting an idea to resolve an outstanding issue, just to check feasibility before I made too many claims. The issue comes in that therustc-dev-guide
is what's linked from from rust-lang/Rust, and the opening page mentions here, thestd-dev-guide
, which contains a lot of helpful procedural and code style/requirements info, and other neat internals info, but nothing about actually building or testingstd
(/core
/alloc
etc).Unfortunately, you're then left confused, and going back to both the
README
of the mainRust
repo, and therustc-dev-guide
to try and scan for any chapter heading mentioning "std" or "library" or similar, until you finally have to sit down and just read and realize it's in the guide called "building the compiler", and running tests is in "testing the compiler".Honestly if I was newer to coding or otherwise didn't know how bootstrapping compilers and the distribution thereof worked, I probably would've assumed
rustc-dev-guide
was a lost cause altogether. It's an odd situation where the existence of this guide makes the presence of this info inrustc-dev-guide
less obvious, because there's a specific place it "should" be. This is probably especially true for people newer to programming or open source than me who may be concerned that technical talk about building the compiler may go over their heads, but would be comfortable trying to play withstd
since that's mostly the type of code they're familiar with.Note, this is mentioned here: #1 but I thought an explicit issue may be better than a comment on that:
I can try drafting a simple PR to either copy over and simplify this info as appropriate, or at least say "for building and testing follow the instructions at (link to building the compiler) and (link to testing the compiler)" when I have time, but for now I thought I'd at least raise the issue.
(Edit: I do see now in the
rustc
book there's a listing in theGetting Started
that lists std, core, alloc etc, but it's easy to miss and doesn't change much for this book.x.py
also explicitly asks what you want to do but you're unlikely to get there yourself IMO.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: