Skip to content

Eliminate ast::ptr::P #878

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 of 3 tasks
nnethercote opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Eliminate ast::ptr::P #878

nnethercote opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team

Comments

@nnethercote
Copy link

Proposal

ast::ptr::P was added in rust-lang/rust#13316, in the year 2014 CE. It was created as an alternative to the now-defunct @T. It is a thin wrapper around Box and is used in many parts of the AST. It has a moderate-sized API, but a lot of the operations are unused, and the rest are barely used and easily replaced with Box operations.

At this point P just a useless layer of indirection and obfuscation. Many direct uses of Box have crept into the AST alongside the uses of P. Box is superior in every way except brevity. (Especially box patterns!)

Proposed transition:

  1. Remove the few uses of P::map.
  2. Remove the one use of P<[T]>.
  3. Remove all the P<[T]> operations.
  4. Remove unused P<T> operations (most of them).
  5. Reduce P<T> to a typedef of Box<T>, plus the P constructor fn.
  6. Eliminate P<T>, by mass-converting P<T> to Box<T> and P(x) calls to Box::new(x).

rust-lang/rust#141603 does the first five steps.

Mentors or Reviewers

N/A

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:

  • File an issue describing the proposal.
  • A compiler team member or contributor who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second.
    • Finding a "second" suffices for internal changes. If however, you are proposing a new public-facing feature, such as a -C flag, then full team check-off is required.
    • Compiler team members can initiate a check-off via @rfcbot fcp merge on either the MCP or the PR.
  • Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins. If no objections are raised after 10 days, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

@nnethercote nnethercote added T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc labels May 27, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 27, 2025

Important

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that.
Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

Concerns or objections can formally be registered here by adding a comment.

@rfcbot concern reason-for-concern
<description of the concern>

Concerns can be lifted with:

@rfcbot resolve reason-for-concern

See documentation at https://forge.rust-lang.org

cc @rust-lang/compiler

@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label May 27, 2025
@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member

ZuseZ4 commented May 27, 2025

@rustbot second

@rustbot rustbot added the final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement label May 27, 2025
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label May 29, 2025
@nnethercote
Copy link
Author

Ten days with no objection: approved.

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2025
Reduce `ast::ptr::P` to a typedef of `Box`

As per the MCP at rust-lang/compiler-team#878.

r? `@fee1-dead`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants