-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
Documentation website #279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I would like to help out on this. Personally I've never been a fan of RDoc and I think RuboCop's docs do a much better job https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop |
@kddnewton I really like how haml.info has their website and docs arranged. They do a good job IMO at many of the core points you mentioned:
Looking forward to your feedback on this |
Yeah I like that too! The thing I'd like to have is to have the https://ruby-syntax-tree.github.io/ functionality embedded into the docs as well, so that folks can play around with it live. |
I like this approach! However to do this we'd need to add a dropdown or something in the live preview to select what code we want in the editor, sort of like the Go Playground Or is there a simpler way to do this? |
Yeah I think something like that would work nicely. But I'd also like it have a file viewer with the file contents, because it would be nice to allow the user to run format/mutate/index/ctags on a given source file and see the output. |
The current project documentation consists of using RDoc to publish to GitHub pages and the README. These are fine resources, but don't really tell the whole story. Also, I do not understand how to cannot navigate the RDoc pages, and I'm the author of the gem.
Instead, we should build a full-on documentation website. This should include all of the information that we already have, plus a lot of stuff that we don't have, like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: