You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is the idea to have an additional way to program with rsatoolbox where the user can pass data arrays directly into functions, as discussed previously alongside #160
Today we discussed this as there is some renewed interest.
Two ways to implement this
inside-out: internal code should work on arrays/tensors, and the current object-based API wraps and unwraps these. The functional API then becomes trivial
outside-in: The functional API wraps the existing object-based API.
Two considerations for choosing between these
a) complexity, amount of work involved in refactoring
b) performance. Will 2) have a lot of overhead?
We should learn something about b) during our work on searchlight-style pipelines.
This is the idea to have an additional way to program with
rsatoolbox
where the user can pass data arrays directly into functions, as discussed previously alongside #160We currently have no urgency in implementing this but this issue is here to keep the idea around.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: