Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Support for Foxy #94

Open
hakunaMatataHub opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[Question] Support for Foxy #94

hakunaMatataHub opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@hakunaMatataHub
Copy link

Is this package supported for ROS2 - Foxy? I assumed it is because it does not say other wise. But I am unable to build it with foxy? There is no branch for Foxy either. Please clarify if this is indeed supported for foxy or not?

@christophebedard
Copy link
Member

christophebedard commented Dec 8, 2023

We recently created branches for all non-end-of-life distros, so we didn't create one for Foxy, since it is end-of-life. It probably wouldn't be that hard to get the rolling branch to build for Foxy, though.

@rosiakpiotr
Copy link

As mentioned in #19 ROS Foxy does not have GenericSubscription and GenericPublisher which means that only topics with types known at compile time can be supported, evetually.
It is possible to use command line param in ros2 run that will specify message types. Based on this param, relay node could create pubs/subs based on switch statement to map into known types. That is the case for C++ impl, in Python it is more flexible and manual mapping is not required (what I mean is it can be automated using Python itself inside node code).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants