Who is the maintainer of this gem?

[chulkilee]

On this comment @realdoug said

FYI, the gem is actually now being maintained here: https://github.com/realdoug/omniauth-salesforce/

Is it true? If then,

• gem.homepage in gemspec should be updated
• this repository should be marked as no longer maintained blabla

And @realdoug added MIT license at realdoug/omniauth-salesforce@7813e94 but I could not find whether the original author @richardvanhook had agree with that specific license (ref #4)

[realdoug]

@chulkilee I'll let @richardvanhook chime in on his thoughts on the MIT License. I added it because Richard expressed that the code should be open source and the MIT License is in use for many salesforce related OS projects including the databasedotcom gem You make a good point about gem.homepage, I'll go ahead and make that update. It'll be in the next time there is a release.

A note on the homepage of this repo would probably help reduce any confusion though.

[richardvanhook]

Yes, I agree with that license (MIT).

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Doug Friedman notifications@github.comwrote:

@chulkilee https://github.com/chulkilee I'll let @richardvanhookhttps://github.com/richardvanhookchime in on his thoughts on the MIT License. I added it because Richard
expressed that the code should be open source and the MIT License is in use
for many salesforce related OS projects including the databasedotcom gemhttps://github.com/heroku/databasedotcomYou make a good point about gem.homepage, I'll go ahead and make that
update. It'll be in the next time there is a release.

A note on the homepage of this repo would probably help reduce any
confusion though.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/10#issuecomment-17906381
.

[nixme]

@richardvanhook, Would you open to a PR that changed the README to point to the newly maintained fork?

[richardvanhook]

Sure thing - link to https://github.com/realdoug/omniauth-salesforce?

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Gopal Patel notifications@github.comwrote:

@richardvanhook https://github.com/richardvanhook, Would you open to a
PR that changed the README to point to the newly maintained fork?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/10#issuecomment-31893873
.

[realdoug]

👍