Hi,
Thanks for providing such an effective scRNA normalization method, and we are applying it to our newest research!
However, when applying different normalization methods, I noticed that other approaches, such as TC, which equals t(t(counts)/colSums(counts) * mean(colSums(counts))), will be followed by a log transformation to alleviate the effects of extreme values, such as log2(.+1)/log1p().
My confusion is if I normalize the counts data frame through SCnorm, would it be necessary to log transform it as well?
Here is my code for your reference:
sce <- SCnorm(Data = raw, # this is the counts matrix
Conditions = groups,
PrintProgressPlots = FALSE,
FilterCellNum = 10,
NCores=ncore, reportSF = FALSE,
ditherCounts=TRUE)
raw_normed <- SingleCellExperiment::normcounts(sce)
raw_normed <- log2(raw_normed+1)
I would appreciate it if you could help me resolve it.
Thanks,
Yuansheng
Hi,
Thanks for providing such an effective scRNA normalization method, and we are applying it to our newest research!
However, when applying different normalization methods, I noticed that other approaches, such as TC, which equals
t(t(counts)/colSums(counts) * mean(colSums(counts))), will be followed by a log transformation to alleviate the effects of extreme values, such as log2(.+1)/log1p().My confusion is if I normalize the counts data frame through SCnorm, would it be necessary to log transform it as well?
Here is my code for your reference:
I would appreciate it if you could help me resolve it.
Thanks,
Yuansheng