Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data for Victron Energy Meter VM-3P75CT connected to VE.Can not available #26

Closed
adrian-schutte opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@adrian-schutte
Copy link

Hi,

After the switch to this repo data for the Victron Energy Meter VM-3P75CT is not available anymore.

The meter is connected to the VE.Can port on the Cerbo GX and is configured as follows:

image

It is showing up as follows under the Cerbo GX's "Services" "Modbus TCP" "Available Services" screen.

image

The 6 steps in the migration guide were followed to switch to this repo and after I realised the Energy Meter is not updating any of its entities with data I ran a rescan.

Is the below my issue?

Breaking change: Users that have a device with modbus id 0 connected should perform a rescan after installing this update. This will seperate the modbus device with id 0 into it's seperate dedicated device. Unfortunately historical data for the entities, when the device was placed under unit id 100, will not be transfered. All other entities and devices should remain unaffected.

This Device and its Entities was available before the repo switch as per the screen captures below.

image image image

I do not see any new Device or Entities that was created after the rescan for this Energy Meter.

@remcom
Copy link
Owner

remcom commented Jan 10, 2025

I think this is a duplicate of your own ticket: #25

Maybe beter to close this one so we can discuss every thing in your other ticket?

@adrian-schutte
Copy link
Author

adrian-schutte commented Jan 10, 2025 via email

@remcom
Copy link
Owner

remcom commented Jan 10, 2025

Then this is indeed the breaking change issue you found. This ticket is a duplicate of #7

@remcom
Copy link
Owner

remcom commented Jan 16, 2025

@adrian-schutte I think the issue for this ticket are also resolved?

@adrian-schutte
Copy link
Author

@remcom That is correct. We actually tracked the resolution of this issue in #25.

@remcom remcom closed this as completed Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants