From 9fa37078be54a426404d67c782a2d3607bac05a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: baku-ccron Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:31:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Delete the "load-bearing" filler The phrase rates a finding instead of stating one, and the reader can do the rating. Each of the 2 occurrences is either deleted -- where the sentence around it already named the consequence -- or replaced by the consequence it was standing in for. No substitute rating word was introduced. No behaviour change: comments and prose only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) --- rainix-static/src/rpc_preflight.rs | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/rainix-static/src/rpc_preflight.rs b/rainix-static/src/rpc_preflight.rs index e53ab9b..10244c6 100644 --- a/rainix-static/src/rpc_preflight.rs +++ b/rainix-static/src/rpc_preflight.rs @@ -1339,8 +1339,8 @@ mod tests { } } // Guard against this test quietly becoming vacuous: the raw substring - // nesting it was weakened FROM is real and still in the table, so the - // boundary rule is load-bearing rather than decorative. + // nesting it was weakened FROM is real and still in the table, so + // dropping the boundary rule would make `base_sepolia` match `sepolia`. assert!(net("base_sepolia") .env_name .contains(net("sepolia").env_name)); @@ -1618,8 +1618,8 @@ mod tests { // plan", no "quota", no "rate limit" and no "exceeded": strike the // "free plan" needle and it falls all the way through to a bare // RpcError, which reports a billing wall as an unexplained failure and - // fails the network over for no stated reason. That makes this the case - // that keeps the needle load-bearing rather than redundant. + // fails the network over for no stated reason. That makes this the one + // case that fails when the needle is removed. assert_eq!( classify(30, "Request timeout on the free plan", None), Reason::Quota { code: 30 }