diff --git a/peps/pep-0472.rst b/peps/pep-0472.rst index 900e511643c..f91a3cd0c29 100644 --- a/peps/pep-0472.rst +++ b/peps/pep-0472.rst @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ PEP: 472 Title: Support for indexing with keyword arguments -Version: $Revision$ -Last-Modified: $Date$ Author: Stefano Borini, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde Discussions-To: python-ideas@python.org Status: Rejected Type: Standards Track -Content-Type: text/x-rst Created: 24-Jun-2014 Python-Version: 3.6 Post-History: 02-Jul-2014 @@ -282,7 +279,8 @@ Pros Cons '''' -- According to some sources [#namedtuple]_ namedtuple is not well developed. +- According to `some sources `__ + namedtuple is not well developed. To include it as such important object would probably require rework and improvement; - The namedtuple fields, and thus the type, will have to change according @@ -623,29 +621,16 @@ is not the same thing as ``f((1, 2))``.". References ========== -.. [#keyword-1] "keyword-only args in __getitem__" - (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.ideas/27584) +* `"keyword-only args in __getitem__" + `__ -.. [#keyword-2] "Accepting keyword arguments for __getitem__" - (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-June/028164.html) +* `"Accepting keyword arguments for __getitem__" + `__ -.. [#keyword-3] "PEP pre-draft: Support for indexing with keyword arguments" - https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-July/028250.html - -.. [#namedtuple] "namedtuple is not as good as it should be" - (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021257.html) +* `"PEP pre-draft: Support for indexing with keyword arguments" + `__ Copyright ========= This document has been placed in the public domain. - - - -.. - Local Variables: - mode: indented-text - indent-tabs-mode: nil - sentence-end-double-space: t - fill-column: 70 - End: