Workaround for a non-standard vxi11 implementation of the RPC Reply t… #46
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…o a GET PORT Call (PortMapper). Workaround for some equipment which do not set the last fragment bit to 1 for a RPC Reply to a GET PORT Call. Therefore the last fragment is asserted True only when the length of the received data matches the announced length, and the length of the payload corresponds to the length of such a Reply to GET PORT Call (28). The issue is described in https://groups.google.com/g/python-ivi/c/vxrdshKG43E/m/plOXFbsopUgJ?pli=1 The proposed workaround has been succesfully tested with equipment from Anritsu, namely the OSA models MS9740A and MS9740B. Signed-off-by: Florian FRANK <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…o a GET PORT Call (PortMapper).
Workaround for some equipment which do not set the last fragment bit to 1 for a RPC Reply to a GET PORT Call. Therefore the last fragment is asserted True only when the length of the received data matches the announced length, and the length of the payload corresponds to the length of such a Reply to GET PORT Call (28). The issue is described in https://groups.google.com/g/python-ivi/c/vxrdshKG43E/m/plOXFbsopUgJ?pli=1 The proposed workaround has been succesfully tested with equipment from Anritsu, namely the OSA models MS9740A and MS9740B.
Signed-off-by: Florian FRANK [email protected]