diff --git a/docs/python.org/code-of-conduct/reports/transparency-report-2024.md b/docs/python.org/code-of-conduct/reports/transparency-report-2024.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a0f9aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/python.org/code-of-conduct/reports/transparency-report-2024.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Code of Conduct WG transparency report 2024
+
+The Code of Conduct Working Groups received 20 reports and met 17 times in 2024. This transparency report is a brief account
+of how those reports were handled.
+
+The working group conducts business in several ways. It has online meetings, typically scheduled twice a month. It also discusses
+issues in a Slack channel, but most cases are handled in the meetings.
+
+The group conducted 27 votes, of which 26 reached quorum. These votes, some held asynchronously, covered a range of topics,
+including admitting a new member, responding to various cases, addressing communication matters, updating community guidelines,
+and taking actions such as refining the Code of Conduct (CoC) guidelines and providing CoC training.
+
+The 20 reports received by the working group represented 16 distinct issues, because four issues received two reports each.
+11 of these 16 reports received active follow up. The working group advised the relevant teams in six cases and four cases
+were handled directly by local representatives.
+
+A few cases that did not receive a clear follow up include some cases where no action was deemed necessary. We have improved
+our record keeping practices since then, which should ensure better follow up, tracking, and reporting in the future.
+
+Finally, this section provides a brief summary of the kinds of cases that were handled:
+- 5 cases involved microaggressions or aggressive language in Discourse.
+  - 3 cases were handled directly by event or online space representatives.
+  - The working group recommended that the moderators issue a warning in one case.
+- 4 cases related to Discourse communication concerning PSF-Vote discussions.
+  - The working group made recommendations for enforcement action in two cases.
+  - One case was formally logged. In one case, no action was taken.
+- 4 cases addressed communication and wording issues on GitHub:
+  - In one case, the working group advised moderators to ask the reported individual to communicate more respectfully and thoughtfully.
+- 2 cases involved incidents at PSF-sponsored events:
+  - 1 case was handled by an event representative.
+- 1 case was found not to constitute a Code of Conduct violation.