You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The gist is that depending on the resource and its context it can change in value. The good news is that:
we already work with different initiators, which will at least already have a difference between navigate and fetch requests
one can always overwrite the header by setting the value given we won't consider this a locked base header
But still. Would need some research, but I'm pretty certain we can do a better job here in auto emulating it based on the given resource.
Might still turn out to be a won't do, and either for now low prio. But It's something we should revisit in 0.3.
Not available to pick up by anyone for now, as it is anyway blocked on the fact that we don't even have our first draft of UA emulation ready to begin with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
More information about this header can be found in this recent talk: https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/event/fosdem-2025-4852-how-browsers-really-load-web-pages/
The gist is that depending on the resource and its context it can change in value. The good news is that:
But still. Would need some research, but I'm pretty certain we can do a better job here in auto emulating it based on the given resource.
Might still turn out to be a won't do, and either for now low prio. But It's something we should revisit in 0.3.
Not available to pick up by anyone for now, as it is anyway blocked on the fact that we don't even have our first draft of UA emulation ready to begin with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: