-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question/Clarrification - iptv-proxy behind VPN #154
Comments
Thats possible with qmcgaw/gluetun |
User docker-compose:
or u use the little advanced method with traefik to get a letsencrypt cert in case u need ssl. |
Thanks both. From what i understand, gluetun would be useful for where I'd want the client to be on the same machine as the docker container (with iptv proxy and vpn running). My scenario is a little simpler than that... |
No. Gluetun is a vpn client. So u can start the gluetun container who etablish the connection to your vpn provider. Its just for security reason. With this setup u can start the proxy, but when gluetun is not running the proxy can't connect. The answer to your question is, YES. For the provider it may still be possible to detect, that you are using different devices. |
Thanks @zimmflo thats been really really helpful. As my vpn client is always on with a kill switch enabled already, i think im covered, and dont see much need for gluetun. Makes sense that the epg channel list and media content is still direct. Ill definitely look into the user-agent though. Thats a really good shout. Thanks again |
@NovalisVonHardenberg |
Hi.
I'm pretty sure the answer to this is "yes" but would just like to clarify....
If iptv-proxy is running on a machine with a VPN enabled... any IPTV client pointing to the iptv-proxy address will be served the content through the VPN... and i.e. not require the client to also connect to the VPN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: