Monorepo for extension and the PHP library

[avsej]

I use the same repository for both extension and the PHP classes of the wrapper-library. It is single project and API of the extension is not supposed to be used independently.

Right now my composer.json uses name couchbase/couchbase, while the extension is named just couchbase.

Is it possible to have composer.json that can decribe both PHP library and the extension?

With pecl I can do it if I include PHP classes into the package, and they will be correctly installed into include_path.

How to correctly achieve this with pie without repository split?

[asgrim]

Is it possible to have composer.json that can decribe both PHP library and the extension?

At the moment, no. This is a restriction of Packagist and the Composer JSON spec really, and would need changes there; this would have far reaching consequences if not done carefully.

One repo = one package.

The key thing that PIE/Composer use to discriminate between extensions and "all other" PHP packages is the type (i.e. php-ext|php-ext-zend for PHP/Zend extensions, anything else is a PHP package).

We are aware of this, as it also affects the Datadog extension; they also have all their PHP and C code in the same place.

Unfortunately, I don't have a clear path forward here, without splitting the PHP and C code, but I am absolutely open to suggestions.