-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Binaries on GitHub Releases? #237
Comments
We probably could, since we're already running the test infrastructure on Linux and Windows anyway, and I think we just need to do this conditionally when its a release tag. That said, the current Windows MSVC makefile generates a static object ( |
Before publishing, I have linux and mac covered with
My process for managing this was
So my guess is, which is a wild guess since I don't use windows, that the build would stick the new file ( Perhaps if we do this with a CI, my question would be — is there a way to build all three operating systems somehow? My process was doing all three builds then publish. Not sure how to map this properly, but I'm sure we can figure it out! |
Having the (shared) binaries compiled upstream would be great for us. I am currently doing a manual cross compilation and persisting the objects to git: |
The GitHub releases, eg the
16-5.1.0
release seen below, do not currently have binaries for common platforms likewin32-x64
,darwin-x64
,darwin-arm64
,linux-x64
,linux-arm64
:Would @pganalyze be open to publishing binaries with releases (eg. as a part of a CI action)?
This would be helpful for projects based on
libpg_query
, such as thelibpg-query
npm package by @pyramation and others:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: