FR: Proof of Performance Claims in Blog #1135
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
It is posted in the documentation, the results may vary depending on the dependencies set you choose. Maybe I am lucky that the chosen dependencies just work better on PDM by coincidence? You can run the benchmark locally by pdm run benchmark. You need to pre-install the package managers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FWIW, there was a defect in resolution, and the fix hasn't been released, you can try the main branch if you find any possible resolution loops. If you find the posted result is outdated I will update it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@frostming If you find the posted results are inaccurate on your blog, I would highly recommend correcting them, yes. That is the ethical thing to do. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am finding
pdm
performance to be much slower thanpoetry
on average, especially when adding or removing packages. Each time,pdm
runs through the entire dependency list re-resolving pins of packages.Your blog post make a claim that it is faster than
poetry
andpipenv
, but tests only a single package:click
.I'm finding on Windows, at least for my project, that
pdm
is slower than the alternatives and just as prone to bugs and errors.Describe the solution you'd like
Please provide more definitive proof that
pdm
is indeed faster thanpipenv
andpoetry
. I am not finding this to be the case.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions