You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @patrick-kidger , I've really enjoyed playing around with Lineax!
You have several iterative methods for square systems (CG, GMRES, BICGSTAB) but nothing for least squares problems.
I have a JAX port of scipy.sparse.linalg.lsmr that I should be able to get working with lineax, but wanted to check first:
is this something lineax users would be interested in?
any possible licensing issues with scipy? it's been partially rewritten for different control flow etc, but I'm always a bit paranoid about software copyright stuff
What sorts of tests are needed? I've tested it for basic array inputs but not pytrees, vmapping, implicit solves etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Definitely something we'd be interested in including!
On licensing issues: if you've used the original and then modified it, then we can probably include it whilst reproducing their own license in the implementation file, and in our own top-level LICENSE.
On tests: pytrees definitely need testing. You should also be able to register it with our jvp/vmap/etc. tests that already exist.
Hi @patrick-kidger , I've really enjoyed playing around with Lineax!
You have several iterative methods for square systems (CG, GMRES, BICGSTAB) but nothing for least squares problems.
I have a JAX port of
scipy.sparse.linalg.lsmr
that I should be able to get working with lineax, but wanted to check first:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: