JWS-CT #233
frosty5689
started this conversation in
Ideas
JWS-CT
#233
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hello @frosty5689 I have no immediate plans to support this individual draft with a dedicated API. Should that draft become an IETF WG item and eventually an RFC I will revisit it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think it would be immensely helpful for others who stumble here if you provided a snippet of code about "how" you use jose to issue tokens following that draft though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I recently started using this library for JWS-CT which has been really helpful. So first of all thank you for your hardwork on maintaining this project! I'm wondering if there are plans to extend CompactSign and CompactVerify to potentially support the workflow described in JWS-CT. Specifically the latest draft https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jordan-jws-ct-02.html
I get it is just another use case within JWS spec, so it will mostly just be a helper class that takes the mangling of the resulting Compact JWS out of the hands of the application developer.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions