All command templates should:
- Execute successfully when given appropriate context (≥95% success rate)
- Follow template structure (output matches expected format)
- Use project context (reference constitution, spec, previous outputs)
- Produce consistent results (similar input → similar output across runs)
- Work across all agents (cross-agent consistency ≥80%)
Current State:
- ✅ Command templates exist for all workflow stages
- ✅ Templates have clear structure and prompts
- ❌ No baseline metrics for success rate per command
- ❌ No quality assessment framework
- ❌ No cross-agent consistency data
- ❌ Unknown which commands work best/worst with which agents
Current State
Commands to Test
| Command |
Stage |
Template |
Status |
/constitution |
Initial |
constitution.md |
❓ Untested |
/spec |
Specification |
spec.md |
❓ Untested |
/plan |
Planning |
plan.md |
❓ Untested |
/architect |
Design |
architect.md |
❓ Untested |
/green |
TDD Green |
green.md |
❓ Untested |
/red |
TDD Red |
red.md |
❓ Untested |
/refactor |
TDD Refactor |
refactor.md |
❓ Untested |
/explainer |
Documentation |
explainer.md |
❓ Untested |
/phr |
Reflection |
phr.md |
⚠️ Partially tested |
/adr |
Decisions |
adr.md |
⚠️ Partially tested |
What We Know
- ✅ Templates exist and have structure
- ✅ Commands work in manual testing
- ⚠️ Some informal experience with success/failure
What We Don't Know
- ❓ Success rate per command per agent
- ❓ Output quality consistency
- ❓ Context awareness level
- ❓ Which commands fail most often
- ❓ Common failure patterns
- ❓ Cross-agent consistency
Success Metrics
Per-Command Metrics
| Command |
Success Rate |
Quality Score |
Context Use |
Consistency |
Target |
/constitution |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥95% |
/spec |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥95% |
/plan |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥90% |
/architect |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥90% |
/green |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥85% |
/red |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥85% |
/refactor |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥85% |
/explainer |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥90% |
/phr |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥95% |
/adr |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
≥90% |
Cross-Agent Metrics
| Agent |
Avg Success |
Avg Quality |
Best Commands |
Worst Commands |
Overall |
| Copilot |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
| Claude |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
| Cursor |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
| Gemini |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
| Cline |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
❓ |
Target: ≥85% overall success rate across all commands and agents
All command templates should:
Current State:
Current State
Commands to Test
/constitutionconstitution.md/specspec.md/planplan.md/architectarchitect.md/greengreen.md/redred.md/refactorrefactor.md/explainerexplainer.md/phrphr.md/adradr.mdWhat We Know
What We Don't Know
Success Metrics
Per-Command Metrics
/constitution/spec/plan/architect/green/red/refactor/explainer/phr/adrCross-Agent Metrics
Target: ≥85% overall success rate across all commands and agents