Skip to content

firm up the requirement on the Review section of the application #21

@pahjbo

Description

@pahjbo

The requirements have previously been documented in the https://github.com/orppst/guide/tree/main/docs/Design section of the documentation. One thing that has been lacking is perhaps any explicit connection to the original requirements gathering collected in this document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TooT9nVS-z-pzYaurz_UMPgyX0kQzuBE/ - this should be reassessed and the requirements on the TAC/Review part of Polaris expanded.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions