You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Exected Behavior
I expected that when I ran the tunneler I wouldn't get an ERROR indicating "ip pool exhausted"
Actual Behavior:
When running the ziti-edge-tunnel in run-host mode, and when specifying a service that has an intercept configuration, a strange erorr is observed:
ERROR tunnel-cbs:ziti_dns.c:122 next_ipv4() DNS ip pool exhausted (0 IPs). Try rerunning with larger DNS range.
Deployment Method: AWS Fargate Service without a Load Balancer:
This confirms my hypothesis that the Linux tunneler emits a misleading error message about exhausted IP pool when it is functioning strictly as a reverse-proxy (run-host mode) and does not need or use any intercept IP addresses. @scareything
When using https://hub.docker.com/r/openziti/ziti-host the docker container is attempting to allocate IP addresses.
Exected Behavior
I expected that when I ran the tunneler I wouldn't get an ERROR indicating "ip pool exhausted"
Actual Behavior:
When running the ziti-edge-tunnel in
run-host
mode, and when specifying a service that has an intercept configuration, a strange erorr is observed:Deployment Method: AWS Fargate Service without a Load Balancer:
log-events-viewer-result (2).csv
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: