Discussion on OSI approved license #241
Replies: 4 comments
-
Actually, it needs a license that explicitly clarifies
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In my opinion, you can either do science, or you can develop closed-source software, not both. Ideally your open-source software would have open-source dependencies, but that is too much to ask in some cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I agree with you, personally. Still, there are codes that we're reusing where we cannot change the license anymore, there are open source matlab codes using closed-source packages and frameworks, there are open source but not OSI-approved licensed codes .... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yep. Most software is closed source because the authors did not spend time to clean up their mess. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Why do we exclude non-OSI licenses. I can buy a piece of software and reuse it. I can buy a closed-source piece of software and reuse it by implementing its documented APIs
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions