Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW]: PyBOP: A Python package for battery model optimisation and parameterisation #7874

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
Python review Shell TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @BradyPlanden (Brady Planden)
Repository: https://github.com/pybop-team/PyBOP
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v24.12
Editor: @jgostick
Reviewers: @leeberty84, @nickbrady
Archive: Pending

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8e75852231729446406eeb105645bd00"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8e75852231729446406eeb105645bd00/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8e75852231729446406eeb105645bd00/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8e75852231729446406eeb105645bd00)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@leeberty84 & @nickbrady, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jgostick know.

Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest

Checklists

@leeberty84, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@nickbrady, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.70 s (291.1 files/s, 390611.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Text                             2              0              0         223970
Python                         131           3679           6304          14716
SVG                             14             26              1           6701
Jupyter Notebook                20              0          12769           1570
CSV                              1              0              0           1389
TeX                              2            123             26           1232
Markdown                        11            367              9            841
YAML                            11             92             48            658
JSON                             4              0              0            149
TOML                             1             10              0             94
reStructuredText                 3             72             30             69
Bourne Shell                     2             14             16             28
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
JavaScript                       1              0              4             13
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           205           4395          19215         251465
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   884	Brady Planden
   297	NicolaCourtier
   111	pre-commit-ci[bot]
    43	Agriya Khetarpal
    38	allcontributors[bot]
    31	Ferran Brosa Planella
    26	martinjrobins
    19	Dibyendu-IITKGP
    18	BLYTH Mark UNIVERSITE BRISTOL
    17	Mark Blyth
     9	David Howey
     8	MarkBlyth
     7	Martin Robinson
     2	Grimm

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

🚨 Wordcount for paper.md is 3053

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5334/jors.309 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.252 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1149/1.2221597 is OK
- 10.1149/1.2054684 is OK
- 10.1088/2516-1083/ac7d31 is OK
- 10.1149/2.0341708jes is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04051 is OK
- 10.1088/2516-1083/ac692c is OK
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230859 is OK
- 10.1016/j.est.2021.103388 is OK
- 10.1016/j.est.2019.100828 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9050 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/acada7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125966 is OK
- 10.1201/b10905 is OK
- 10.2307/3318737 is OK
- 10.1007/s11222-006-8769-1 is OK
- 10.1063/1.1699114 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ac11a5 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1711.05101 is OK
- 10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Battery Parameter eXchange
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Pr...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy pr...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BlackJAX: Composable Bayesian inference in JAX
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The DeepMind JAX Ecosystem
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Len...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyBaMM EIS: Efficient Linear Algebra Methods to De...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Méthode générale pour la résolution des systemes d...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1770 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@jgostick
Copy link

jgostick commented Mar 5, 2025

Hi @nickbrady and @leeberty84, thanks very much for agreeing to review this package. There is a link to reviewer guidelines at the top of this thread but here is the short version:

  • Create a 'reviewer checklist' for yourself
  • Start playing with the package and checking off the boxes
  • As you find issues or problems, open issues on the PyBOP repo
  • Once you've ticked all the boxes, then your job in done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Python review Shell TeX Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants