-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Full test set (including all GSPs for all datetimes) #491
Comments
@JackKelly @jacobbieker thoughts? |
Ah, yes, very good point! To do an exhaustive comparison against ESO's GSP-level PV forecasts, you're right that we should really run inference for every timestep of the test period (basically most of 2021). And, as you say, But, during ML model training, we also want a smallish validation set, so we can look for overfitting during training. It shouldn't be too hard to get But let's set this as a lower priority that some of the other issues (like fixing NaNs) because, if worse comes to worst, we can still evaluate against ESO's forecasts, even with our current random test set |
I've added this to the "nice to have" list of #393 but feel free to edit! |
Yeah, I agree with @JackKelly, once we have other stuff finished, then make the whole test set, so we know the data is looking good! |
As Peter pointed out in openclimatefix/nowcasting_utils#72 we need a test set that includes all GSPs for all datetimes in order to compute national PV |
#515 might be good also only to do up to 2021-09-01 for the moment too |
Perhaps a different method would be to make sure the test set has all GSP's but doenst cover all datetimes. Then we could do say 1000 datetimes. Total would be This seems a better way to start than the ~ 1 million batches for all datetimes |
In order to compare with ESO - do we need a test set, that is ALL GSPs for all datetimes?
Detailed Description
To compare against ESO we might need predictions from models for all gsps and all datetimes. This would be roughly
338 * (8 * 31 * 24 * 12) = 24 million predictions
Context
We want to compare our models to the ESO ones
Possible Implementation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: