Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST]: save hash instead of name in web client #1098

Open
5 tasks done
eqiuwnzeqx9uuat opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
5 tasks done

[REQUEST]: save hash instead of name in web client #1098

eqiuwnzeqx9uuat opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@eqiuwnzeqx9uuat
Copy link

This feature request respects the following points:

  • This is a feature request, not a question or a configuration issue; Please visit our forum first to troubleshoot with volunteers, before creating a report. The links can be found here.
  • This issue is not already reported on GitHub (I've searched it).
  • I'm using an up to date version of OpenBullet2. We generally do not support previous older versions. If possible, please update to the latest version before opening an issue.
  • I agree to follow OpenBullet's Code of Conduct.
  • This report addresses only a single feature request; If you have multiple feature request, kindly create separate reports for each one.

Description of the feature request

Use the hash instead of the name in the wordlist section when saving a file to the web version as previous version

Is your feature request related to a problem

this saves from incompatibility between windows and unix systems in the way file names are handled and reduces the occurrence of problems

Describe the solution you'd like

Use the hash instead of the name in the wordlist section when saving a file to the web version as previous version

Describe alternatives you've considered

Reuse the old method of saving the previous version

Relevant screenshots or videos

No response

Additional information

No response

@eqiuwnzeqx9uuat eqiuwnzeqx9uuat added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 2, 2024
@openbullet
Copy link
Owner

How would you be able to identify which wordlist it is if the original name is not saved? Also, could you explain in more detail exactly what the issue is, like where you're encountering trouble when using multiple OS versions, and how you're accessing the same OB2 instance from multiple OSes.

@openbullet openbullet added the question Further information is requested label Sep 6, 2024
@eqiuwnzeqx9uuat
Copy link
Author

eqiuwnzeqx9uuat commented Sep 13, 2024

How would you be able to identify which wordlist it is if the original name is not saved?

I think I expressed myself wrong, I mean that when you connect to ip:port/wordlists you find a "table" what I want in the File Name section there is UserData/Wordlists/HASH.txt and not the name of the file I upload.
EXAMPLE

Name Type Purpose Lines File Name
test Default 1 UserData/Wordlists/test1.txt

I want the hash in the File Name, I can understand what it is from the Name field, why I should have the name of the files on a server program and this solves problems with the names of the files that cause me a lot of trouble, basically I don't want to save test1.txt but HASH.txt and then why do I have to double click on the upload button, now I have a file loaded in the UserData/Wordlists directory but it doesn't appear in the program because I didn't press add.

In case I want the file from the "server program" to my device I just need to see the Name field and look in userdata for the hash of the file or when a download button will be added just use the name field and download only UserData/Wordlists/HASH.txt so you get the file back as I originally uploaded it (you can download the file not with the hash but with the name) and I will have no more problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants