-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Demo Script (final Itea Review) #512
Comments
Do you want me to provide an update to those files which make them pass ProR's new ReqIF-validator? Or are you ok with the status quo? |
Dear Moritz, If you have new files, which could be used and just plugged it would be great to use them. Do you already have the files? Vest regards Jan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Do you want me to provide an update to those files which make them pass ProR's new ReqIF-validator? Or are you ok with the status quo? — |
@janWelte I don't have the files, yet. But I have the tool to generate them :) |
That's great. Thanks a lot. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- @janWelte https://github.com/janWelte I don't have the files, yet. But I have the tool to generate them :) — |
This does not seem to be done yet. Hence, it does not make sense to provide any new ReqIFs either. If you internally need files for testing, please get back to me. Otherwise, I will wait for the bugfix in ProR. |
Hello Moritz, i am already working on the fix. Can you provide me with the new files for testing, please. Best, |
Here is a version of chapter2 that passes the validator (except for two points regarding ProR's internals - perhaps somebody can give me a hint regarding those). |
Hello Michael, We have been able to import the SysML model, to perform a safety analysis on it and to have some results. For the review, I’ll be able to make a demo (on my machine) that shows :
You could then execute (on your machine - I don’t have a SCADE license) the SCADE test on the SCADE model to show the results Is it OK for you ? Frédérique VALLEE Fixe : +33 (0)1 78 85 81 43 Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 68 92 92 Immeuble Odyssée - Bât E - 2-12 rue du Chemin des Femmes - 91300 MASSY De : Michael Jastram [mailto:[email protected]] We need to elaborate on the demo script, as decided at the Munich Workshop. Please provide your comments below, and updated the script directly here in the description.
— L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. |
Hi Frederique,
There are three problems with this: First, I don't have Scade on my machine either; second, I thought we decided against machine switching, due to the time constraints; and last, this sounds really extensive, considering how little time we have. I would suggest the following: If you provide me with step by step instructions, I can show this as part of my demo. Alternatively, maybe it makes more sense to show this as part of WP4 - @MarcBehrens - what do you think? |
Hello Michael, Considering the time we have I think that it is not easy to show all the needed steps in a « pure demo » (switch needed between Scade system/ESF/Scade suite -> too long). What do you think if I prepare a video of less than 5 mn that you could launch on your PC? Best regards, Frédérique De : Michael Jastram [mailto:[email protected]] Hi Frederique, Is it OK for you ? There are three problems with this: First, I don't have Scade on my machine either; second, I thought we decided against machine switching, due to the time constraints; and last, this sounds really extensive, considering how little time we have. I would suggest the following: If you provide me with step by step instructions, I can show this as part of my demo. Alternatively, maybe it makes more sense to show this as part of WP4 - @MarcBehrens https://github.com/MarcBehrens - what do you think? — L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. |
I think this is a great idea! |
Dear everyone, the problem is that at the moment no file and model are set up already to be shown. This has to be done. To do so the best case is using Chapter 3 and implementing the results for one modul block e.g. train positioning. Seconf option would be Level and Mode. |
Dear Jan, We have performed the safety analysis in the block “ProvidePositionReport” (ErrorManager – BuildSinglePostReport) in the SysML model that seems to be fine ! By the way could you remind me the name of the report in which François has to describe this analysis ? Of course he has some problems to compile the corresponding function in the SCADE model (in that case the last test proposed in our demo could not be run). Best regards, FRV De : Jan Welte [mailto:[email protected]] Dear everyone, the problem is that at the moment no file and model are set up already to be shown. This has to be done. To do so the best case is using Chapter 3 and implementing the results for one modul block e.g. train positioning. Seconf option would be Level and Mode. — L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. |
Dear Frederique, the report is D4.3.3 whioch is placed ast https://github.com/openETCS/validation/tree/master/Reports/D4.3/D4.3.3-Final-VV-report-on-tool-chain-process as it is shown in openETCS/validation#310. If @FrancoisRevest has problems with the latex file he shall just hand me his content and I'll add it. |
@FrederiqueVallee one more thing - can you keep it to 2-3 minutes? Keep in mind that we have only 25 minutes for presentation and the other tool demos. Thanks! |
OK Michael we’ll do our best to take less than 3 mn. |
-> Which Model to open? I propose to open:
Double clicking F2_ETCS_Kernel will open 13 sub-diagrams, here you might want to either continue with
or:
|
Hello Moritz,
Thank you. I changed the Editor and Renderer to work with RFC Compliant URIs.
"[D] The required feature 'leftHeaderColumn' of 'ProrSpecViewConfigurationImpl' must be set":
as a child element of configuration:ProrSpecViewConfiguration "[D] The required feature 'presentationConfigurations' of 'ProrToolExtensionImpl' must be set": |
Hello Peter, For us :
would be perfect ! Best regards, Frédérique VALLEE Fixe : +33 (0)1 78 85 81 43 Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 68 92 92 Immeuble Odyssée - Bât E - 2-12 rue du Chemin des Femmes - 91300 MASSY De : Peter Mahlmann [mailto:[email protected]] -> Which Model to open? I propose to open:
Double clicking F2_ETCS_Kernel will open 13 sub-diagrams, here you might want to either continue with
or:
— L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. |
Great! Thank you.
This Error is correct. We are validating the xhtml source against the w3 schema (http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml) which says that a tr has to contain at least one td or th element. |
Can we now take the new files, or do you need to fix thi point? |
@iweigelt You are right. Turns out MS Word, in fact, supports rows without any cells... Anyhow, I fixed this point. |
Thanks to everyone. Am 14.12.2015 um 02:28 schrieb Moritz Dorka [email protected]: This Error is correct. We are validating the xhtml source against the w3 schema (http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml) which says that a tr has to contain at least one td or th element. @iweigelt You are right. Turns out MS Word, in fact, supports rows without any cells... Anyhow, I fixed this point. So: @janWelte you are set to go with the new files! — |
We need to elaborate on the demo script, as decided at the Munich Workshop. Please provide your comments below, and updated the script directly here in the description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: