You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the Prometheus Operator, we have developed a cool feature called ScrapeClass, which allows us to define common configurations that are automatically injected into every scrape configuration.
This feature is particularly useful for standardizing configurations such as common relabeling rules, certificates, and other settings. It ensures consistency across monitored objects without requiring users to repeatedly define the same settings for each scrape target.
I’d love to hear your thoughts—do you think this could be a valuable addition to the PrometheusCR integration?
Describe the solution you'd like
Extend TA Config to allow define scrape class structure while using PrometheusCR integration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds good to me. One point worth mentioning is that unlike in prometheus-operator, in a target allocator + otel collector setup, service discovery and scraping happen in different applications. Right now we solve the issue around credentials by encrypting traffic between the target allocator and prometheus receiver, and simply exposing them via target allocator endpoints. Not sure if that makes any difference for scrape classes specifically.
Component(s)
target allocator
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the Prometheus Operator, we have developed a cool feature called ScrapeClass, which allows us to define common configurations that are automatically injected into every scrape configuration.
This feature is particularly useful for standardizing configurations such as common relabeling rules, certificates, and other settings. It ensures consistency across monitored objects without requiring users to repeatedly define the same settings for each scrape target.
I’d love to hear your thoughts—do you think this could be a valuable addition to the PrometheusCR integration?
Describe the solution you'd like
Extend TA Config to allow define scrape class structure while using PrometheusCR integration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: