Open Questions about syncs #1283
-
Hello, first of all thanks for your flagd contribution to open source! We are evaluating on using flagd and have some open questions.
Thanks a lot for your response, we would love to collaborate on that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hey @arthurgassmann, thanks for reaching out. It's not possible to dynamically add new syncs at runtime. What use case did you have in mind? The flag sync only supports sending the full flag configuration. We originally had support for sending deltas but we found that the added complexity wasn't worth the maintenance burden. Since flagd supports merging multiple sources, it's possible to scope your flags however you would like. There are no plans currently to support a DB source. We've considered adding support for s3-compatible storage providers but we'll only implement this if it works cross-platform. That would be the challenge with adding DB support. There's no clear DB dialect that would be universally useful. I would recommend putting a simple API in front of the DB that supports either the flagd definition over HTTP or the gRPC sync. You also may be interested in joining the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hey @arthurgassmann, thanks for reaching out.
It's not possible to dynamically add new syncs at runtime. What use case did you have in mind?
The flag sync only supports sending the full flag configuration. We originally had support for sending deltas but we found that the added complexity wasn't worth the maintenance burden. Since flagd supports merging multiple sources, it's possible to scope your flags however you would like.
There are no plans currently to support a DB source. We've considered adding support for s3-compatible storage providers but we'll only implement this if it works cross-platform. That would be the challenge with adding DB support. There's no clear DB dialect that w…