Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Are you open to adding vim-like key-bindings? #7

Open
dumblob opened this issue Jul 14, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Question: Are you open to adding vim-like key-bindings? #7

dumblob opened this issue Jul 14, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@dumblob
Copy link

dumblob commented Jul 14, 2013

I'd like to use this editor because of its simplicity, responsiveness etc., but I'm used to vim-bindings in conjunction with some basic state-behavior (contrary to state-less as the current emacs-like one).

I'm aware of the "very religious" statement, but why not being "very schizophrenic-religious"? :)

Are there any plans to support it in the future?

@nsf
Copy link
Owner

nsf commented Jul 14, 2013

No. However, there is a project that is based on godit and it follows the vi path. Check it out here: https://github.com/kisielk/vigo

As for godit, I want to leave it as it is, that is configuration-less. I have no goal making this editor to fulfill everybody's needs. It was made to work perfectly for me and I don't mind sharing the code. In general I will fix things or add new features only if I have a need for them. Sorry if that's disappointing, but seriously, take a look at the vigo link above or do your own fork.

I'll leave the issue open, because you can't really find vigo in github's forks menu.

@dumblob
Copy link
Author

dumblob commented Jul 14, 2013

Wow, I didn't find vigo although I tried really hard. Thank you!

BTW it's perfectly OK to be "minimal" without fulfilling everybody's needs and it surely isn't disappointing - IMHO it's the right way to go, to let it fit authors needs!

@nsf nsf added the question label Dec 13, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants