-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v.2.2.0 fails on multiple replicates of the same sample #159
Comments
Hey! Could you share some steps to reproduce this error? Maybe a minimal samplesheet? Are you using something like:
Or whatever name you're using? |
The command I run is similar to this:
My samplesheet looks like this:
And my params.json looks like this:
These input files work fine with pipeline v2.1.1 |
Just tried running |
Is there anyway I could get the exact command, not just similar? I only ask because the error message has Only thing I could think of is if you're naming both of the files This causes issues because nf-validation is checking to make sure you didn't accidentally include the sample file twice. But I'd expect that to fail out sooner. |
I replaced unnecessary details of my local paths preserving the conceptual structure. I'm not sure if knowledge of a path to my work directory would help :)
My samplesheet is:
Filepaths are different, the only shared thing is the final name itself, To try out your suggestion, I created a symlink for the second file, so the samplesheet becomes:
So both the directories and the names are different. And I ran the
I tried to manually make an index (another node, another samtools version, another working folder), but it failled with the same error. At the same time, So, regarding replicates of the same sample, the issue is indeed with the same file handle. This is an unexpected behaviour: files are in different folders, I created them in a standard way, it seems intuitive to have same file handles for the same type of outcome. And I don't think a user is expected to know about this problem. Anyway, I can approve #161, but still, the UX is not optimal. Regarding |
Okay, |
Description of the bug
Hey!
I was running the nascent pipeline v2.2.0 on two replicates of the same sample, and encountered the following error at the step of FASTQC:
While v2.1.1 runs without this error. It might be related to #143.
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: