Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kinesis instrumentation #2974

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Kinesis instrumentation #2974

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

hannahramadan
Copy link
Contributor

Before contributing, please read our contributing guidelines and code of conduct.

Overview

Describe the changes present in the pull request

Submitter Checklist:

  • Include a link to the related GitHub issue, if applicable
  • Include a security review link, if applicable

Testing

The agent includes a suite of unit and functional tests which should be used to
verify your changes don't break existing functionality. These tests will run with
GitHub Actions when a pull request is made. More details on running the tests locally can be found
here for our unit tests,
and here for our functional tests.
For most contributions it is strongly recommended to add additional tests which
exercise your changes.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Perform code review
  • Add performance label
  • Perform appropriate level of performance testing
  • Confirm all checks passed
  • Add version label prior to acceptance

Copy link
Contributor

SimpleCov Report

Coverage Threshold
Line 93.88% 93%
Branch 69.5% 50%

@@ -1561,6 +1561,15 @@ def self.notify
:allowed_from_server => false,
:description => 'Controls auto-instrumentation of the aws_sdk_lambda library at start-up. May be one of `auto`, `prepend`, `chain`, `disabled`.'
},
:'instrumentation.kinesis' => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

James had a question about the consistency of our aws sdk config options. For most of our instrumentation.* configs, the snake cased name of the gem is used. However, we're not consistent with our AWS configs. Some are snake case, others are just smaller portions of the name, like instrumentation.dynamodb. Do we want to establish more consistency? What do you think about using the gem name vs. the AWS service name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants