Note that the default configuration of runc
(foreground, new terminal) is
generally the best option for most users. This document exists to help explain
what the purpose of the different modes is, and to try to steer users away from
common mistakes and misunderstandings.
In general, most processes on Unix (and Unix-like) operating systems have 3
standard file descriptors provided at the start, collectively referred to as
"standard IO" (stdio
):
0
: standard-in (stdin
), the input stream into the process1
: standard-out (stdout
), the output stream from the process2
: standard-error (stderr
), the error stream from the process
When creating and running a container via runc
, it is important to take care
to structure the stdio
the new container's process receives. In some ways
containers are just regular processes, while in other ways they're an isolated
sub-partition of your machine (in a similar sense to a VM). This means that the
structure of IO is not as simple as with ordinary programs (which generally
just use the file descriptors you give them).
Before we continue, it is important to note that processes can have more file
descriptors than just stdio
. By default in runc
no other file descriptors
will be passed to the spawned container process. If you wish to explicitly pass
file descriptors to the container you have to use the --preserve-fds
option.
These ancillary file descriptors don't have any of the strange semantics
discussed further in this document (those only apply to stdio
) -- they are
passed untouched by runc
.
It should be noted that --preserve-fds
does not take individual file
descriptors to preserve. Instead, it takes how many file descriptors (not
including stdio
or LISTEN_FDS
) should be passed to the container. In the
following example:
% runc run --preserve-fds 5 <container>
runc
will pass the first 5
file descriptors (3
, 4
, 5
, 6
, and 7
--
assuming that LISTEN_FDS
has not been configured) to the container.
In addition to --preserve-fds
, LISTEN_FDS
file descriptors are passed
automatically to allow for systemd
-style socket activation. To extend the
above example:
% LISTEN_PID=$pid_of_runc LISTEN_FDS=3 runc run --preserve-fds 5 <container>
runc
will now pass the first 8
file descriptors (and it will also pass
LISTEN_FDS=3
and LISTEN_PID=1
to the container). The first 3
(3
, 4
,
and 5
) were passed due to LISTEN_FDS
and the other 5
(6
, 7
, 8
, 9
,
and 10
) were passed due to --preserve-fds
. You should keep this in mind if
you use runc
directly in something like a systemd
unit file. To disable
this LISTEN_FDS
-style passing just unset LISTEN_FDS
.
Be very careful when passing file descriptors to a container process. Due
to some Linux kernel (mis)features, a container with access to certain types of
file descriptors (such as O_PATH
descriptors) outside of the container's root
file system can use these to break out of the container's pivoted mount
namespace. This has resulted in CVEs in the past.
runc
supports two distinct methods for passing stdio
to the container's
primary process:
- new terminal (
terminal: true
) - pass-through (
terminal: false
)
When first using runc
these two modes will look incredibly similar, but this
can be quite deceptive as these different modes have quite different
characteristics.
By default, runc spec
will create a configuration that will create a new
terminal (terminal: true
). However, if the terminal: ...
line is not
present in config.json
then pass-through is the default.
In general we recommend using new terminal, because it means that tools like
sudo
will work inside your container. But pass-through can be useful if you
know what you're doing, or if you're using runc
as part of a non-interactive
pipeline.
In new terminal mode, runc
will create a brand-new "console" (or more
precisely, a new pseudo-terminal using the container's namespaced
/dev/pts/ptmx
) for your contained process to use as its stdio
.
When you start a process in new terminal mode, runc
will do the following:
- Create a new pseudo-terminal.
- Pass the slave end to the container's primary process as its
stdio
. - Send the master end to a process to interact with the
stdio
for the container's primary process (details below).
It should be noted that since a new pseudo-terminal is being used for
communication with the container, some strange properties of pseudo-terminals
might surprise you. For instance, by default, all new pseudo-terminals
translate the byte '\n'
to the sequence '\r\n'
on both stdout
and
stderr
. In addition there are a whole range of ioctls(2)
that can only
interact with pseudo-terminal stdio
.
NOTE: In new terminal mode, all three
stdio
file descriptors are the same underlying file. The reason for this is to match how a shell'sstdio
looks to a process (as well as remove race condition issues with having to deal with multiple master pseudo-terminal file descriptors). However this means that it is not really possible to uniquely distinguish betweenstdout
andstderr
from the caller's perspective.
If you have already set up some file handles that you wish your contained
process to use as its stdio
, then you can ask runc
to pass them through to
the contained process (this is not necessarily the same as --preserve-fds
's
passing of file descriptors -- details below). As an example
(assuming that terminal: false
is set in config.json
):
% echo input | runc run some_container > /tmp/log.out 2> /tmp/log.err
Here the container's various stdio
file descriptors will be substituted with
the following:
stdin
will be sourced from theecho input
pipeline.stdout
will be output into/tmp/log.out
on the host.stderr
will be output into/tmp/log.err
on the host.
It should be noted that the actual file handles seen inside the container may
be different based on the mode runc
is being used in (for
instance, the file referenced by 1
could be /tmp/log.out
directly or a pipe
which runc
is using to buffer output, based on the mode). However the net
result will be the same in either case. In principle you could use the new
terminal mode in a pipeline, but the difference will become
more clear when you are introduced to runc
's detached mode.
runc
itself runs in two modes:
You can use either terminal mode with either runc
mode.
However, there are considerations that may indicate preference for one mode
over another. It should be noted that while two types of modes (terminal and
runc
) are conceptually independent from each other, you should be aware of
the intricacies of which combination you are using.
In general we recommend using foreground because it's the most
straight-forward to use, with the only downside being that you will have a
long-running runc
process. Detached mode is difficult to get right and
generally requires having your own stdio
management.
The default (and most straight-forward) mode of runc
. In this mode, your
runc
command remains in the foreground with the container process as a child.
All stdio
is buffered through the foreground runc
process (irrespective of
which terminal mode you are using). This is conceptually quite similar to
running a normal process interactively in a shell (and if you are using runc
in a shell interactively, this is what you should use).
Because the stdio
will be buffered in this mode, some very important
peculiarities of this mode should be kept in mind:
-
With new terminal mode, the container will see a pseudo-terminal as its
stdio
(as you might expect). However, thestdio
of the foregroundrunc
process will remain thestdio
that the process was started with -- andrunc
will copy allstdio
between itsstdio
and the container'sstdio
. This means that while a new pseudo-terminal has been created, the foregroundrunc
process manages it over the lifetime of the container. -
With pass-through mode, the foreground
runc
'sstdio
is not passed to the container. Instead, the container'sstdio
is a set of pipes which are used to copy data betweenrunc
'sstdio
and the container'sstdio
. This means that the container never has direct access to host file descriptors (aside from the pipes created by the container runtime, but that shouldn't be an issue).
The main drawback of the foreground mode of operation is that it requires a
long-running foreground runc
process. If you kill the foreground runc
process then you will no longer have access to the stdio
of the container
(and in most cases this will result in the container dying abnormally due to
SIGPIPE
or some other error). By extension this means that any bug in the
long-running foreground runc
process (such as a memory leak) or a stray
OOM-kill sweep could result in your container being killed through no fault
of the user. In addition, there is no way in foreground mode of passing a
file descriptor directly to the container process as its stdio
(like
--preserve-fds
does).
These shortcomings are obviously sub-optimal and are the reason that runc
has
an additional mode called "detached mode".
In contrast to foreground mode, in detached mode there is no long-running
foreground runc
process once the container has started. In fact, there is no
long-running runc
process at all. However, this means that it is up to the
caller to handle the stdio
after runc
has set it up for you. In a shell
this means that the runc
command will exit and control will return to the
shell, after the container has been set up.
You can run runc
in detached mode in one of the following ways:
runc run -d ...
which operates similar torunc run
but is detached.runc create
followed byrunc start
which is the standard container lifecycle defined by the OCI runtime specification (runc create
sets up the container completely, waiting forrunc start
to begin execution of user code).
The main use-case of detached mode is for higher-level tools that want to be
wrappers around runc
. By running runc
in detached mode, those tools have
far more control over the container's stdio
without runc
getting in the
way (most wrappers around runc
like cri-o
or containerd
use detached mode
for this reason).
Unfortunately using detached mode is a bit more complicated and requires more
care than the foreground mode -- mainly because it is now up to the caller to
handle the stdio
of the container.
Another complication is that the parent process is responsible for acting as
the subreaper for the container. In short, you need to call
prctl(PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER, 1, ...)
in the parent process and correctly
handle the implications of being a subreaper. Failing to do so may result in
zombie processes being accumulated on your host.
These tasks are usually performed by a dedicated (and minimal) monitor process per-container. For the sake of comparison, other runtimes such as LXC do not have an equivalent detached mode and instead integrate this monitor process into the container runtime itself -- this has several tradeoffs, and runc has opted to support delegating the monitoring responsibility to the parent process through this detached mode.
In detached mode, pass-through actually does what it says on the tin -- the
stdio
file descriptors of the runc
process are passed through (untouched)
to the container's stdio
. The purpose of this option is to allow a user to
set up stdio
for a container themselves and then force runc
to just use
their pre-prepared stdio
(without any pseudo-terminal funny business). If
you don't see why this would be useful, don't use this option.
You must be incredibly careful when using detached pass-through (especially
in a shell). The reason for this is that by using detached pass-through you
are passing host file descriptors to the container. In the case of a shell,
usually your stdio
is going to be a pseudo-terminal (on your host). A
malicious container could take advantage of TTY-specific ioctls
like
TIOCSTI
to fake input into the host shell (remember that in detached
mode, control is returned to your shell and so the terminal you've given the
container is being read by a shell prompt).
There are also several other issues with running non-malicious containers in a
shell with detached pass-through (where you pass your shell's stdio
to the
container):
-
Output from the container will be interleaved with output from your shell (in a non-deterministic way), without any real way of distinguishing from where a particular piece of output came from.
-
Any input to
stdin
will be non-deterministically split and given to either the container or the shell (because both are blocked on aread(2)
of the same FIFO-style file descriptor).
They are all related to the fact that there is going to be a race when either
your host or the container tries to read from (or write to) stdio
. This
problem is especially obvious when in a shell, where usually the terminal has
been put into raw mode (where each individual key-press should cause read(2)
to return).
NOTE: There is also currently a known problem where using detached pass-through will result in the container hanging if the
stdout
orstderr
is a pipe (though this should be a temporary issue).
When creating a new pseudo-terminal in detached mode, and fairly obvious
problem appears -- how do we use the new terminal that runc
created? Unlike
in pass-through, runc
has created a new set of file descriptors that need to
be used by something in order for container communication to work.
The way this problem is resolved is through the use of Unix domain sockets.
There is a feature of Unix sockets called SCM_RIGHTS
which allows a file
descriptor to be sent through a Unix socket to a completely separate process
(which can then use that file descriptor as though they opened it). When using
runc
in detached new terminal mode, this is how a user gets access to the
pseudo-terminal's master file descriptor.
To this end, there is a new option (which is required if you want to use runc
in detached new terminal mode): --console-socket
. This option takes the path
to a Unix domain socket which runc
will connect to and send the
pseudo-terminal master file descriptor down. The general process for getting
the pseudo-terminal master is as follows:
- Create a Unix domain socket at some path,
$socket_path
. - Call
runc run
orrunc create
with the argument--console-socket $socket_path
. - Using
recvmsg(2)
retrieve the file descriptor sent usingSCM_RIGHTS
byrunc
. - Now the manager can interact with the
stdio
of the container, using the retrieved pseudo-terminal master.
After runc
exits, the only process with a copy of the pseudo-terminal master
file descriptor is whoever read the file descriptor from the socket.
NOTE: Currently
runc
doesn't support abstract socket addresses (due to it not being possible to pass anargv
with a null-byte as the first character). In the future this may change, but currently you must use a valid path name.
In order to help users make use of detached new terminal mode, we have provided
a Go implementation in the go-runc
bindings, as
well as a simple client.