You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One thing I would love juliet to be capable, is the combined GP modelling of activity indicator/photometry with RV or Transit data. In principle it is very similar to sharing hyperparameters between different instruments and therefore maybe its not to hard to implement. One must only exclude the Keplerian model to be applied on the activity indicators or photometry.
I think this is a good way to constrain your GP and I see more and more studies which use this technique.
Best,
Stephan
PS: I might be influenced a lot by the Sagan workshop this week.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, this has been in the backburner for me for a while. I think it would mean adding an extra "dataset" type to juliet, so as we have "photometry" and "RVs" we would also have "activity indicators" that as you say would be very similar to the RV models, only ommiting the Keplerians.
I'll leave it in the backburner for now, hoping I have time to implement this in the near future. It should take me about a couple of days, but those are days I currently don't have sadly.
Hi Nestor,
One thing I would love juliet to be capable, is the combined GP modelling of activity indicator/photometry with RV or Transit data. In principle it is very similar to sharing hyperparameters between different instruments and therefore maybe its not to hard to implement. One must only exclude the Keplerian model to be applied on the activity indicators or photometry.
I think this is a good way to constrain your GP and I see more and more studies which use this technique.
Best,
Stephan
PS: I might be influenced a lot by the Sagan workshop this week.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: