448. **`sandbox --output-format json` has contradictory state flags — `enabled:true, supported:false, active:false, filesystem_active:true, allowed_mounts:[]`: claim that sandbox is "enabled" while OS doesn't support namespace isolation and `allowed_mounts:[]` is empty contradicts `filesystem_active:true filesystem_mode:"workspace-only"`** — dogfooded 2026-05-11 by Jobdori on `7244a82b` in response to Clawhip pinpoint nudge at `1503403842920779917` (using fresh-current-main runner at `/tmp/claw-dog-1430` per gajae's 14:00 protocol switch). Reproduction: `claw sandbox --output-format json` on macOS (where `unshare` is unavailable) returns `{"active":false,"active_namespace":false,"active_network":false,"allowed_mounts":[],"enabled":true,"fallback_reason":"namespace isolation unavailable (requires Linux with \`unshare\`)","filesystem_active":true,"filesystem_mode":"workspace-only","in_container":false,"kind":"sandbox","markers":[],"requested_namespace":true,"requested_network":false,"supported":false}`. **Three contradictions in the same envelope:** (a) `enabled:true` AND `supported:false`: what does "enabled" mean if the OS doesn't support sandboxing? Read literally, sandbox is *enabled but unsupported* — semantic nonsense. The likely intent is "user requested sandbox in config" but the field name `enabled` says "is ON". A better name would be `requested:true` or `config_intent:true`, with `enabled` reserved for the actually-active state. (b) `filesystem_active:true, filesystem_mode:"workspace-only"` AND `allowed_mounts:[]`: if the filesystem fence is active in workspace-only mode, the workspace directory itself MUST be an allowed mount. An empty `allowed_mounts:[]` array combined with `filesystem_active:true` means either (i) the fence is being misreported (it's not really active), (ii) the workspace is implicit and `allowed_mounts` only lists *additional* mounts, or (iii) the fence has no allowed paths and nothing is readable — all three are inconsistent with the user-facing summary. (c) `active:false` AND `filesystem_active:true`: the top-level `active` field is a single boolean summary, but it disagrees with `filesystem_active:true` (one component is active). Either `active` is "all components active" (then it should be `false` when any component is off) or "any component active" (then it should be `true` when filesystem is). The current value is `false` despite filesystem being active. **Sibling: no `claw sandbox --help`**: `claw sandbox status` and `claw sandbox --help` go to LLM-prompt fallback or hang (gajae confirmed at 13:00 that `sandbox status` returns typed `cli_parse` but `sandbox --help` is bounded — schema is non-uniform across help paths). **Required fix shape:** (a) rename `enabled` to `requested` or `config_intent` to disambiguate from "currently active"; (b) make `allowed_mounts` explicitly include the workspace when filesystem_mode is "workspace-only" (`allowed_mounts:[{path:"<cwd>",writable:true,reason:"workspace_root"}]`); (c) document the `active` aggregate semantics: pick either "all" or "any" composition rule and document the choice; (d) add `active_components:["filesystem"]` array as a richer alternative to the single boolean — surfaces exactly which sandbox subsystems are live; (e) regression test: when `filesystem_mode == "workspace-only"`, `allowed_mounts` MUST contain the cwd and `active` must agree with the documented composition rule. **Why this matters:** sandbox is the trust surface — automation that checks `sandbox.active == true` before running a risky LLM prompt sees `false` (no namespace, no network) and assumes no isolation, but `filesystem_active:true` means there IS partial isolation. The mixed signal forces consumers to OR all `*_active` fields together. Cross-references #428 (default permission_mode=danger-full-access — paired with sandbox-not-active means zero isolation), #444 (no broad-cwd guard — sandbox is the only safety net and its status is unclear). Source: Jobdori live dogfood, `7244a82b`, 2026-05-11.
0 commit comments