Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Smarter Docker + Vagrantfile caching #503

Closed
ahmadia opened this issue May 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Smarter Docker + Vagrantfile caching #503

ahmadia opened this issue May 19, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@ahmadia
Copy link
Contributor

ahmadia commented May 19, 2015

@amfarrell - after digging around on the documentation for Vagrant, it looks like caching Docker images will be a non-trivial endeavor. The best solution I found is this:

fgrehm/vagrant-cachier#131

Basically, we can't map the Docker cache to a synchronized directory on the host directory. The best solution is to manually save and load Docker images manually. I think I can automate this in the Vagrant script, but I may not get to it tonight.

@amfarrell
Copy link
Contributor

How frequently are users going to be spinning up new vagrant boxes? If they are only installing the system locally and running salt highstate once, how impactful is this issue?

@ahmadia
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmadia commented Jun 5, 2015

This is a developer, not a user issue. It's not priority.

On Friday, June 5, 2015, Andrew Farrell [email protected] wrote:

How frequently are users going to be spinning up new vagrant boxes? If
they are only installing the system locally and running salt highstate
once, how impactful is this issue?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#503 (comment)
.

@ahmadia
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmadia commented Aug 10, 2015

This isn't really an issue anymore as Docker is no longer part of the development build.

@ahmadia ahmadia closed this as completed Aug 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants